🧪 Is PowerBall XTRA really random?
We run all 869 PowerBall XTRA draws since 19.06.2018 through 11 statistical tests. The question: do the draws behave the way pure chance predicts, or are there patterns, “hot” numbers, seasonal effects?
No anomaly: 1 of 11 tests fall below the 5% threshold – pure chance would produce 0.55. After correcting for multiple testing (Holm), no finding remains.
| Test | Finding | p-value | p (Holm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform numbers Is every number drawn equally often? χ² = 40.9 with 49 df; largest deviation: 14 (z = 2.61). | normal | 0.789 | 1.000 |
| Uniform PowerBall Are all PowerBall drawn equally often? 40 draws; χ² = 32.0 with 15 df; largest deviation: 2 (z = 3.59). | slightly unusual, not significant after correction | 0.006 | 0.071 |
| Seasonal numbers Do some numbers come up more often in certain months? number × month, χ² = 608.7 with 588 df; most extreme cell: 29 in October (z = 3.98). | normal | 0.269 | 1.000 |
| Draw day Do the numbers depend on the day of the draw? number × weekday, χ² = 97.5 with 98 df; most extreme cell: 14 on Friday (z = 2.66). | normal | 0.494 | 1.000 |
| Stability over time Have the frequencies shifted over the years? 4 periods, χ² = 181.0 with 196 df; largest deviation: 45 in period 1 (z = 3.24). | normal | 0.771 | 1.000 |
| Sum of numbers Do the sums follow the exact distribution? mean sum 126.65 (theoretical 127.50); χ² = 22.5 with 31 df. | normal | 0.867 | 1.000 |
| Even/odd Is the mix of even and odd numbers right? χ² = 5.4 with 5 df. | normal | 0.374 | 1.000 |
| Consecutive numbers Do pairs like 12–13 appear as often as expected? 36.4% of draws contain consecutive numbers (theoretical 35.3%). | normal | 0.513 | 1.000 |
| Repeats from previous draw Does a draw depend on the previous one? on average 0.53 numbers of the previous draw come up again (theoretical 0.50). | normal | 0.237 | 1.000 |
| Number pairs Do certain pairs come up together too often? most frequent pair 40 + 45: 17 times (expected 7.1); spread of all pairs compared with 100 random series. | normal | 0.752 | 1.000 |
| Gaps between hits Are a number's absences as long as pure chance predicts? gap distribution compared with 100 simulated random series. | normal | 0.574 | 1.000 |
The latest draw
Draw of 16.10.2026 (13 33 34 35 47) – rarest feature: 3 consecutive numbers; this happens about once every 43 draws.
Almost every draw has some “rare” feature if you look at enough features. That is no sign of manipulation.
Strategies on trial: do frequent or overdue numbers predict anything?
For every draw since 19.06.2018, the test picks numbers using only the earlier draws (last N draws) and counts how many come up in the next draw. The benchmark is what a random selection of the same size hits on average.
Popular strategies
| Strategy | Selection | Hits per draw | expected | ratio | p-value | p (Holm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| … | |||||||
Test your own mix
N1/N2: frequency within the last N draws. N3/N4: current gap (draws since last hit, over the whole history). Overlaps count once.
Distribution of hits per draw
observed expected (chance)
Cumulative excess / shortfall vs. chance
Important: every combination has the same chance in every draw. No strategy can improve the number of hits; test enough variants and you will still find some with p < 5% – that is chance (see above, multiple testing).
How to read the table
The p-value is the probability of a result at least this extreme under pure chance. Below 5%, a single test is usually called “significant”. Because 11 tests run at once, about 0.55 such hits are expected by chance alone; the Holm correction accounts for that. Only a result still below 5% after correction would be a serious hint.
Method
Based on the official draws of the current 5/50 format (since 19.06.2018). Frequency tests: chi-square corrected for drawing without replacement. Pairs and gaps: compared with 100 simulated random series of the same length (Monte Carlo, two-sided). Everything is recalculated after every draw.
Rules & FAQ
Is PowerBall XTRA rigged?
The data show no sign of it. 1 of 11 tests fall below 5% (0.55 expected by pure chance), 0 after correcting for multiple testing. The draws behave like those of a fair drawing machine.
Can these tests predict winning numbers?
No. Precisely because the draws pass the tests, there is no exploitable pattern: every combination has the same chance in every draw.
Why is a test sometimes “unusual”?
At the 5% level, one test in twenty fires by pure chance on average. That is why we also show the Holm-corrected p-value, which accounts for the number of tests.